Advanced English · Reading and VocabularyLesson 05 of 50

Lesson 05

The Organ You Were Not Born With

Subject
The gut microbiome and the gut–brain axis
Register
Popular-science feature — semi-formal, second person, conversational authority
Level
C1–C2
Extent
1,012 words

You arrived sterile, or very nearly so. For nine months you were sealed away from the microbial world, and then, in the space of a few hours, you were colonised. Bacteria from your mother, from the air, from the first hands that held you, moved in and began to multiply. Within three years the settlement had stabilised into something recognisably yours — a population of microorganisms as individual as a fingerprint, and considerably harder to wash off.

We used to say that microbial cells outnumbered human cells ten to one, a figure that appeared in a great many articles, including some written by people who should have checked it. A careful recalculation published in 2016 brought the ratio down to roughly one to one. Even that revision, though, is a strange thing to sit with. Somewhere between thirty and forty trillion bacteria are living inside you right now, the overwhelming majority of them in your large intestine, and the honest summary is that you are about half something else.

Biologists have taken to calling this population an organ, and the word is not a flourish. An organ is a mass of tissue performing coordinated functions that the body cannot perform otherwise, and by that definition the case is straightforward. Your gut bacteria synthesise vitamin K and several B vitamins. They train your immune system in early life to distinguish genuine threats from harmless proteins. They break down fibre that your own digestive enzymes cannot touch, and in doing so they manufacture short-chain fatty acids — butyrate above all — which feed the cells lining your colon and circulate through the rest of you as signalling molecules. Remove the microbiome entirely, as researchers do when they raise germ-free mice in isolators, and the animal does not merely get sick. It develops abnormally: a thinner gut wall, an underdeveloped immune system, a differently wired brain.

That last item is where the field becomes genuinely interesting, and where you should start reading more carefully.

Your intestine contains something in the order of five hundred million neurons — its own nervous system, sometimes called the second brain, capable of running peristalsis without any instruction from your head. It is connected upward by the vagus nerve, a thick cable of which roughly eighty per cent of fibres carry traffic in the unexpected direction: from gut to brain, not brain to gut. Add to this the fact that gut bacteria produce or provoke the production of neuroactive compounds — a striking proportion of the body's serotonin originates in the intestine — and you have a plausible physical basis for something people have reported for as long as anyone has bothered to write it down. The gut talks. It is not a figure of speech that your stomach turns before an examination.

The experimental evidence is, in places, remarkable. Germ-free mice behave differently from conventionally raised ones: more anxious in some strains, less cautious in others, with measurable differences in stress hormones. Colonise them with bacteria from an anxious donor and behavioural traits appear to travel with the transplant. Sever the vagus nerve first and, in several studies, the effect vanishes — strong evidence that the signal is genuinely being carried along that route rather than arriving by some other means.

Here, though, is where a good science writer is obliged to apply the brakes, and where the popular coverage has been least disciplined. Mice are not people. A mouse raised in a sterile isolator is an extreme organism with no human equivalent. The step from "bacteria influence rodent behaviour" to "a probiotic yoghurt will fix your mood" is not a small one, and a great deal of commercial enthusiasm has been built on a foundation that the underlying research does not yet support.

The core difficulty is the oldest one in the discipline: telling correlation from causation. People with depression, obesity, autoimmune conditions and a long list of other disorders reliably show gut microbial compositions that differ from those of healthy controls. That is well established. What is not established, in most cases, is the direction of the arrow. Illness changes what you eat, how much you move, how well you sleep and which medications you take, and every one of those changes will reshape a microbiome. Finding an altered gut in a sick person may reveal a cause, a consequence, or simply a shared upstream driver.

Where the causal case has actually been proven, the results have been dramatic — and instructive about how high the bar is. Faecal microbiota transplantation, which is exactly what its name suggests, is now a recognised treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, a condition in which aggressive antibiotics have stripped the gut so thoroughly that a single opportunist takes over. Success rates exceed ninety per cent, far surpassing further antibiotics. It works because the problem is genuinely and simply ecological: a niche has been emptied and needs refilling. Attempts to extend the same procedure to conditions with tangled, multifactorial causes have so far produced results that are, to put it charitably, mixed.

So what should you actually do with this? Less than the supplement aisle would like, and more than nothing.

The intervention with the strongest and least glamorous evidence behind it is dietary fibre. Your bacteria eat what you cannot digest, and most people in wealthy countries give them very little to work with. Diversity of plant foods across a week tracks with diversity of gut species better than almost any other measure, and diversity, in an ecosystem, is what buys resilience. Fermented foods appear to help. Unnecessary antibiotics do measurable damage, and recovery after a course can take months. Beyond that, most confident claims outrun the data.

It is an unusual position for a field to occupy: important beyond serious dispute, and simultaneously overrun by people selling certainty that nobody has earned. The interesting question is no longer whether the population inside you matters. It is how much of what you call yourself is being negotiated, quietly and continuously, with thirty trillion tenants who were never asked to leave.

Key vocabulary

sterile adj.
completely free of living microorganisms.
colonise v.
to settle and establish a population in a new area.
flourish n.
a decorative or showy addition; here, "not a flourish" = not mere rhetoric.
synthesise v.
to produce a compound by combining simpler substances.
peristalsis n.
the wave-like muscular contraction that moves food through the gut.
plausible adj.
reasonable and believable, though not proven.
provoke v.
to cause or trigger a reaction.
strain n.
a genetic variety within a species, especially of microbes or lab animals.
sever v.
to cut through completely.
obliged adj.
required by duty or professional standard.
disciplined adj.
rigorous and restrained; here, describing careful reporting.
enthusiasm n.
eager interest; here with a faintly critical edge.
reliably adv.
consistently; in a way that can be depended on.
upstream adj.
earlier in a causal chain. "A shared upstream driver" = a common prior cause.
opportunist n.
an organism that exploits a sudden vacancy or weakness.
niche n.
the particular role and position an organism occupies in an ecosystem.
multifactorial adj.
resulting from many interacting causes.
charitably adv.
generously; "to put it charitably" softens a harsh judgement.
glamorous adj.
attractive and exciting; here used ironically of scientific advice.
resilience n.
the capacity to recover from disturbance.
outrun v.
to go beyond; "claims outrun the data" = assertions exceed the evidence.
tenant n.
an occupant who lives in a space belonging to someone else.

Phrases and collocations

in the space of a few hours
within a very short period.
something in the order of
approximately; used before large estimated figures.
a figure of speech
a non-literal expression. "Not a figure of speech" = literally true.
to apply the brakes
to slow down deliberately; to introduce caution.
tell correlation from causation
to distinguish things that co-occur from things that cause each other.
far surpassing
greatly exceeding. Formal comparative.